Gay Jesus, Oui; Violent Mohammed, Non
University of Toronto Student newspaper The Strand has printed this cartoon of Jesus kissing Mohammed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9776a/9776a65966ad6b5983fb65877371e194b2751fc1" alt=""
Unfortunately, their view of press freedom is timid, limited to offending only those they feel confident will not respond with violence.
Via The Jawa Report.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9776a/9776a65966ad6b5983fb65877371e194b2751fc1" alt=""
Unfortunately, their view of press freedom is timid, limited to offending only those they feel confident will not respond with violence.
But was it really freedom of the press, or a case of media martyrdom? Publishing these cartoons seems to do little more than fan the flames of already-existing controversy. Is it the press's responsibility to decide what people should absorb, or is providing an option more important? Articles are somewhat different; you can decide whether or not to read something based on the headline - which, admittedly, is questionable on the subject of giving audiences agency. A graphic or photograph, however, is much more intense: you don't really have the choice to view it or not.You don't have the choice whether or not to view a graphic or photograph? This is tortured logic, the sort of self-deluding rationalization that virtually every major American news outlet has used to justify their moral cowardice.
Via The Jawa Report.
<< Home